Track systems - Articles and news items

The ÖBB/Porr ballastless track system

Issue 2 2007, Past issues / 3 April 2007 /

ÖBB, The Austrian Federal Railway Company, transports approximately 183.3 million passengers and 90.6 million tons of freight traffic per year. The ÖBB railway network consists of approximately 3,600 kilometres of main railway lines and in the region of 2,200 kilometres supplementary network (Figure 1).

At the moment, the maximum line speed is 200 kilometres per hour. This will increase to 250 km/h in the near future. The maximum axle loads are approximately 22.5 tons and the total length of our tracks is 10,500 kilometres. 7,100 kilometres of them are electrified and the network contains about 16,700 switches and crossing units.

Ballastless track at ÖBB

At the beginning of the 1980s, the ÖBB started using ballastless track systems. During the first phase (from 1982 until 1995), several different types of ballastless track systems were tested. In that period, approximately 22,600 meters of ballastless track were built. The main types used at that time were monolithic systems (RHEDA), booted sleeper systems (STEDEF) and precast slab systems (ÖBB/Porr). After this first period, the experience with the different systems gained by ÖBB was evaluated. The following main aspects were investigated:

  • Specific design aspects (needed space etc.)
  • Construction process (sensitivity in order to site situation)
  • Quality (track quality, acoustic behaviour etc.)
  • Economic situation (initial investment costs and life-cycle costs)

The result of this detailed investigation was that for use in the network of ÖBB, the ÖBB/Porr ballastless track system fitted best. Furthermore, it has been established that the main field of use of the ballastless track system are on tunnel-lines.

Due to these facts, only the ÖBB/Porr system has been used in the network of the ÖBB after 1995. For switches and crossing areas, special ballastless systems consisting of booted monobloc sleepers were developed and are still in use now.

At the moment, approximately 130 kilometres of ballastless track systems are under operation within the ÖBB railway network – used mainly in tunnels but also on bridges and on surface lines. For noise and vibration reduction, many of these systems are combined with floating slabs. The system is tested for a maximum train speed of more than 300km/h and has a certification for a maximum train speed of 330km/h. The system is licensed for use in the Austrian, German and Swiss railway network.

Worldwide use of ballastless track systems

The development of ballastless track systems started in the second half of the 20th Century in Japan (due to high speed train traffic). A few years later, these developments reached Europe. The Japanese developments focused on precast elements, but the developments in Switzerland were based on booted sleeper systems while in Germany, the developments were based on monolithic cast in place systems. The worldwide distribution of the main ballastless track system is shown in Figure 2.

Use of the ÖBB/Porr system outside Austria

Due to the very good experiences gained by ÖBB with the ÖBB/Porr Slab Track System, many other railway companies showed interest in the system. Therefore, this ballastless track system has been used at new, large railway connection projects in Berlin: North-South intercity railway connection and East-West connection near the Lehrter Bahnhof. In total, there are approximately 18 kilometres of the ÖBB/Porr ballastless track system currently under operation. The system is situated in tunnels and on bridges with short sections on earthwork.

Main features of the ÖBB/Porr system

The ÖBB/Porr system was designed to replace the typical behaviour of the ballasted track by several elastic elements in the ballastless system. The typical behaviour of a ballasted track shows the elasticity in the ballast itself and in the rail fastening system. These two elastic elements have to be copied by the elasticity of the rail fastening system in the ballastless track and of the elasticity of a second layer which is situated at the bottom of the prefabricated slabs.

This system (shown in Figure 3) leads to a distribution of the elasticity between the elastic coating of the slabs and the rail fastening system of 10% to 90%. Usually, the rail fastening system IOARV 300-1 from Vossloh realises the needed elasticity in the rail fasteners. The elastic coating consists of a PUR-bound granular rubber.

During train operation this leads to rail deflections of 1.5 millimetres under a Taurus locomotive (about 22.5 tons axle load). The main advantages of the system are:

  • Very small space needed (width of slabs is 2.40m and can be reduced down to 2.10m, thickness of slabs is 16cm which leads to a construction height of 50cm from top of rail down to e.g. tunnel floor) which leads to reduction of the necessary cross-section of e.g. tunnels
  • Very good vibration attenuating performance (the system can be addressed as a floating track slab system with about 1 ton per meter sprung mass)
  • Use of the standard rail fastening system Vossloh IOARV 300-1 which makes an easy maintenance possible
  • Simple construction procedure on site (most of the sensitive works are transferred into the prefabrication site)
  • High track quality standard is documented by intensive measurements of all realised projects up to no
  • Quick construction procedure on site because of use of only few concrete on site (most of the fabrication is done at the prefabrication site)
  • Easy and effective repair concept (exchange of rail fasteners or whole slabs can be done very easily in very short time)
  • Very good-natured behaviour in order to extra ordinary events as for example derailment
  • Nearly no regular maintenance work necessary

Possible use of the system for the Turkish railway network

Today, the situation of the Turkish federal railway company, TCDD, shows the following statistic performance (source: www.tcdd.gov.tr): 8,700km main lines, 11,000km total network, about 8,000 units switches and crossings. The maximum line speed is V = 140km/h at the moment. The yearly transportation volume is approximately 77 million passengers and in the region of 20 million tons of freight traffic.

This means that in comparison with ÖBB, the length of the network of TCDD is of comparable size but the transportation volume is significantly lower. These facts have to be reflected – having in mind that the country is several times larger than Austria – which leads to the following statements:

Statement 1

A lot of additional railway lines would be needed to reach a similar density of railway network and furthermore a lot of improvements of the existing network would be necessary to enlarge the transportation volume of the net. Especially the differences in the number of switches and crossings are an indicator for the improvement needs of the existing network.

Statement 2

At the moment, and in the near future, a couple of new high-speed railway lines will be built in Turkey. The maximum line speed of these projects is up to V = 250km/h. Therefore, questions of superstructure are of major importance. Not only in tunnels but also on viaducts, ballastless systems lead to economic (especially in order of long-time aspects) and safety advantages.

Due to the advantages of the ÖBB/Porr system described in this article, in theory it seems to fit very well for the Turkish Railway network. Especially for use in tunnels, which is the main area of application, seems to be effective as well as in Austria. The reasons for that are the much reduced maintenance necessities, the safe run of the trains and the good behaviour of the system in case of derailment events. Furthermore, it is possible to equip the ÖBB/Porr system with a lot of optional elements. For example it is possible to make the whole system rideable for road vehicles (e.g. fire engines, ambulance) by using additional elements. To increase the safety of railway tunnels, this field of usage gets more and more important in Austria. As mentioned above, the system is well suited for combination with noise and vibration attenuating systems (floating track slab systems).

The basic characteristic of the system – most of the construction work takes place in pre¬fabrication sites – makes it useable with a minimum of high-qualified people on site and ensures a very good track quality. Nevertheless, most of the works for the system can be done by local people either in the prefabrication process or on site. The ÖBB/Porr track system can be combined with usual high-elastic rail fastening systems as for example IOARV 300-1 from Vossloh.

Conclusions

At the moment, and in the near future, the Turkish railway network will be enlarged and improved. Therefore, ballastless track forms will be needed as well. The ÖBB/Porr system for ballastless tracks which consists of elastically supported precast concrete slabs is very well suited for the specific situation in Turkey. It shows a lot of advantages for applications in tunnels, on bridges and on surface lines. Due to the prefabrication principle, a very good track quality can be realised with a minimum of high-qualified people on site.

The ÖBB/Porr ballastless track system would be a good contribution to the extension and modernisation of the Turkish railway network. The following points of reference were used for information to help complete this article:

  • TCDD: www.tcdd.gov.tr. RPC Department Statistics Office, Ankara
  • Schilder, R.: Experience in ballastless track gained on ÖBB. European Slab Track Symposium, Brussels, Belgium, 22 February 2005
  • Schilder, R.: Ballastless track application in existing tunnels – experience gained on Austrian Federal Railways. Rail Engineering International Edition 1993 Number 4
  • Schilder, R.: Improvement of ballastless track designs for turnouts: experience gained on Austrian Federal Railways. Rail Engineering International Edition 1999 Number 1
Figure 1: Lines of the ÖBB railway network

Figure 1: Lines of the ÖBB railway network

Figure 2: Distribution of ballast-less systems worldwide

Figure 2: Distribution of ballast-less systems worldwide

Figure 3: Rail fastening system Vossloh IOARV 300-1

Figure 3: Rail fastening system Vossloh IOARV 300-1

About the author

Rudolf Schilder has a diploma in Civil Engineering from the University of Graz, Austria. He also worked there as a university assistant in the Institute of Railway Technology from 1979 to 1983. During these years he received a Doctors degree in Technical Sciences. In 1983 he joined Austrian Federal Railways and occupied several functions. In 1996, as head of Track&Structure Department, Mr. Schilder was in charge of Track Technologies. Since 2005, Mr. Schilder has been Head of Permanent Way Department at ÖBB Bau AG. Mr. Schilder is a member of several national and international working groups, such as OeNorm (Austrian Standardization Office), ÖVG (Austrian Society for Traffic and Transport Science, Working Committee on Railway Technology), CEN (Committee for European Normalization), UIC (International Railway Union), AEIF (European Association for Railway Interoperability) and ERA (European Railway Agency).

Track deterioration in high-speed railways

Issue 2 2007, Past issues / 3 April 2007 /

Present requirements of safety and quality in high-speed lines, considering the demand of increased traffic and higher reliability, lead to the introduction of more and more complex analyses in order to guarantee accurate track maintenance. In this context, systematic application of track tests, both dynamic control (measuring vehicle accelerations) and geometric one (measuring levelling, alignment, cant and gauge), is the key-tool in order to plan corrective work on track.

In general, results deduced by track test regarding degradation disagree with formula from theoretical analyses. Reality is different from predicted results: there is a large amount of factors that change predicted track behaviour. Certainly, factors that traditionally have been identified as causes of track degradation (traffic, speed, axle load) are not enough to explain track geometry progression. In this sense, stability of infrastructure has relevant influence on process of track degradation: high earthworks or structures that modify vertical stiffness of track are able to generate punctually intensive degradation. Difficulty to quantify influence of these factors is due to the stochastic characteristics of most of them. (more…)

HSL-Zuid: ready, steady, go!

Issue 1 2007, Past issues / 6 February 2007 /

In 2007, the High-Speed Line South will connect The Netherlands with the European high-speed railway network. By then, high-speed train connections will have been established, not only to Brussels and Paris, but also within The Netherlands itself.

(more…)

High requirements for safe and reliable track systems

Industry Focus 2007, Past issues / 29 December 2006 /

The wheel/rail system is on the right way to ensure mobility for the future. To compete with road traffic, reliable track systems are necessary which require not only renewal of worn and fatigue stressed track components but also the introduction of optimized and newly developed system innovations as well as respective best practice maintenance concepts. Decisive for economic structures are the life cycle costs. However, it should be considered that higher investment costs can be equalized by lower maintenance costs.

(more…)

Danish rail tracks – demanding more

Issue 3 2006, Past issues / 31 May 2006 /

Approximately 2,700 trains are in operation on the Danish tracks every day.They make use of over 3,240km of tracks, cross 2,342 bridges and intersect with roads at numerous points. The technology involved is mostly of the standard proven type,with a general inclination towards high quality.This is not a land of cutting edge solutions – but this may change in years to come when larger renewal plans are implemented.

The Danish Rail Tracks is, like in most of Europe, a mix of older material and generations of upgrades. The major concern lately is that track joints have been generating problems, not holding inside their tolerances and thus giving way to speed limitations. The existence of rail joints is due to the fact that the overall control system in Denmark is based on electrically separated blocks. Other block systems are in use such as axel counters, but there is no radio or GPS based system currently in use. (more…)

Delivering track renewals

Issue 4 2005, Past issues / 3 November 2005 /

Network Rail faces a challenging set of targets in delivering its £2 billion per annum investment programme. These challenges are particularly daunting in respect of its track renewals programme, where it needs to drive 30% efficiency out of its cost base by the end of the current Regulatory control period in 2008/9, whilst at the same time reducing train delays by 30%.

Head of Major Projects and Investment, Simon Kirby, is adamant: “We have to reach our efficiency savings target. Progress so far has been good and for the end of financial year one, we have reached an efficiency cost saving of 8%.”

All this needs to be achieved at a time when volumes of work are steadily increasing with a 40% increase planned in plain line volumes by 2006/7 and a 50% increase in switch and crossing units compared with recent years. (more…)